منابع مشابه
Pitfalls of reviewing reviews.
I commend Burton et al. [1] for publishing their review in the journal. Important reviews should be subject to the widest readership and most rigorous critique if they are to properly influence future practice. Reviews that are solely conducted by small groups in academia can miss out on the wider stakeholder engagement journals’ offer that encourages debate and fosters learning. A feature of t...
متن کاملCogmed WM training: reviewing the reviews.
Does Cogmed working-memory training (CWMT) work? Independent groups of reviewers have come to what appears to be starkly different conclusions to this question, causing somewhat of a debate within scientific and popular media. Here, various studies, meta-analyses, and reviews of the Cogmed research literature will be considered to provide an overview of our present understanding regarding the e...
متن کاملHamstring tendon harvesting. Reviewing anatomic relationships and avoiding pitfalls.
The gracilis and semitendinosus tendons remain popular grafts for many reconstructive procedures, including anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Surgeons who use other grafts for ACL reconstruction should have the hamstring tendon techniques in their arsenal in the event other grafts are unavailable or undesirable. Detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the medial side of the knee is paramo...
متن کاملThe promise and pitfalls of systematic reviews.
The systematic review "movement" that has transformed medical journal reports of clinical trials and reviews of clinical trials has taken hold in public health, with the most recent milestone, the publication of the first edition of The Guide to Community Health Services in 2005. In this paper we define and distinguish current terms, point out important resources for systematic reviews, describ...
متن کاملReviewing our book reviews: fifty years and counting.
The editorial team of The Gerontologist has been committed to providing its readers with up-to-date information about recently published books focused on gerontological science and practice since the inception of the journal in 1961. The initial issue of the journal included a list of recently published books. The first formal book review (of You Can't Count on Dying, by Natalie Harris Cabot) w...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Occupational Medicine
سال: 2009
ISSN: 0962-7480,1471-8405
DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqp038